Product3 min read

Value a Product Team Delivers

bysanjay

Value a Product Team Delivers

A product team exists for one reason: to deliver value.

Not output. Not velocity. Not features shipped.

Value.

At its simplest, a product delivers value when it solves a real problem for users and advances the goals of the business in a way that can be sustained over time. Miss any part of that equation, and the product eventually fails—sometimes quietly, sometimes spectacularly.

A strong product team builds the right product. That product is:

  • Desirable — users want it
  • Viable — it supports the business
  • Feasible — it can be built and maintained well

These are not independent qualities. They are interdependent constraints. Product value only exists where all three are satisfied.

In essence:

(•-•)⌐ Business + (⌐⊙_⊙) Technology + ( 0 _ 0 ) User = ❤ Product Value

Design is not adjacent to this equation. Design is how the equation gets solved.

Design Is Not a Separate Function

One of the most damaging myths in product development is that design is a layer that can be added later—or worse, a service function that “supports” product.

This framing is wrong.

Design is not decoration. Design is not UI. Design is not independent from product.

Design is the discipline responsible for shaping how value is experienced by users. Without design, desirability is unknowable. And without desirability, product value collapses.

A product manager may be accountable for building the right thing, but design is how the team discovers what “right” actually means.

Separating design from product leads to predictable failure modes:

  • Products that technically work but feel unusable
  • Features that meet requirements but fail to change behavior
  • Interfaces that optimize for systems instead of people

These are not design problems. They are product failures.

The Three Forces of Product Value

Every meaningful product decision lives at the intersection of three forces. Ignore one, and the product degrades—sometimes immediately, sometimes over time.

Desirable: Value to the User (Design-Led)

Desirability is not a matter of opinion. It is revealed through behavior.

A product is desirable when it:

  • Solves a real problem users recognize
  • Fits naturally into their workflows
  • Reduces friction or creates leverage

Design plays a central role here—not as aesthetics, but as sense-making. Designers help teams understand user intent, context, and mental models. They surface insights that data alone cannot.

Without design, teams guess. With design, teams learn.

Viable: Value to the Business (Product-Led)

Viability ensures the product supports the company’s goals—economic, strategic, and operational.

This includes revenue, but also:

  • Cost structure
  • Risk exposure
  • Differentiation
  • Long-term leverage

Viability forces trade-offs. Those trade-offs are product decisions, not executive abstractions. Product managers, designers, and engineers must navigate them together.

A product that delights users but cannot sustain itself is not viable. A product that sustains itself but users resent will not last.

Feasible: Value to Technology (Engineering-Led)

Feasibility answers a deeper question than “can we build this?”

It asks:

  • Can we maintain it?
  • Can we evolve it?
  • Can we operate it without heroics?

Engineering judgment ensures that desirability and viability are grounded in reality. Design that ignores feasibility becomes fantasy. Feasibility without design becomes rigidity.

From Vision to Value (With Design Embedded)

Product value does not emerge from execution alone. It is shaped across a sequence of decisions, each one informed by product, design, and engineering judgment.

    Vision
     ↓
    Strategy
     ↓
    Principles
     ↓
    Priorities
     ↓
    Execution  →  Product Value (User + Business + Tech)
     ↓
    Evangelism
     ↓
    Go-To-Market (GTM)

Design is present at every layer of this flow:

Product, Design, and Engineering (include Data) as a Single System

High-performing product teams do not operate as handoff machines.

They operate as a triad:

  • Product defines the problem space and trade-offs
  • Design explores and validates user value
  • Engineering ensures feasibility and scale

Remove any one, and the system breaks.

When design is treated as independent, teams ship faster—but in the wrong direction. When design is embedded in product, teams build less—but learn more, and win more often.

The Product Team’s Real Job

The real job of a product team is to continuously align:

  • User needs (discovered through design)
  • Business goals (shaped through product judgment)
  • Technical reality (grounded in engineering)

This alignment is fragile. It degrades without intention. And it cannot be replaced by process, tools, or org charts.

One last note for larger organizations: Risk, Cyber Security, Compliance, Legal etc. is not optional. Risk, Cyber Security, Compliance, Legal etc. is not downstream. Risk, Cyber Security, Compliance, Legal etc. is product.

← Back to posts